On Thursday, 14 May 2015 at 00:12:05 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2015 08:54:15 -0400, Namespace
<rswhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
As far as I know, the problem (or at least one of the biggest
problems) for rvalue references was that they could escape.
Since DIP25 is approved and already implemented this problem
should be solved. Would it be possible to allow rvalues
references now? I'm just curious what the mindfactory of D has
in mind and what the scheme for that problem is.
Side note: DIP36 seems to be missing the table with the
authors, status, etc.
Bit
Huh, DIP36? DIP36 was rejected, but the authors (me and Dicebot)
are below.
I've heard that DIP69 is [quote]almost dead in favor of
DIP25[/quote]. That's why I'm a bit confused and would like to
know the scheme, if any. :)
