On 05/17/2015 10:35 AM, Idan Arye wrote:
...How about defining `alloc.allocate(0)` to *be* an error?
What is bad about allocate(0)?
Re: std.allocator.allocate(0) -> return null or std.allocator.allocate(1)?
Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d Sun, 17 May 2015 05:11:05 -0700
- Re: std.al... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.al... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.al... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.al... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.alloca... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.al... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.al... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.alloca... deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.allocator.alloc... Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.allocator.allocate(0) -> ... Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.allocator.allocate(0) -... Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.allocator.allocate(... Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.allocator.alloc... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.allocator.allocate(0) -> ... Peter Alexander via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.allocator.allocate(0) -... deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.allocator.allocate(... Peter Alexander via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.allocator.alloc... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: std.allocator.allocate(0) -... Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
