Re: std.allocator: nomenclature needed

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/18/15 7:21 PM, Mike wrote:

On Friday, 15 May 2015 at 03:27:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

Also, I need two more good names: one for what's now called
"porcelain" - high-level typed interface for allocators

Would it be better to move the porcelain code into package.d so the
nomenclature simply becomes `import std.allocator;`?

Probably a good thing to do. -- Andrei