On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Vladimir Panteleev <[email protected]> wrote:
> This was discussed before. IIRC, someone suggested to force using a > control-flow keyword (break/continue/goto) at the end of a case. Using > "continue" to fall through was rejected because it changes its meaning when > there's a switch in a loop. You'd use goto <value> to jump to the particular > (next) switch case. "goto case;" already exists and jumps to the next case in the switch. So bam, you're already set ;)
