On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 15:13:41 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 24 May 2015 at 14:13:26 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Would be interesting to get some opinions on this.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1282
Looks like a good step in the right direction.
Some questions about:
This provides a strong incentive to no longer use the magic
semantics of the builtin AAs,
Could you elaborate on what these magic semantics are?
and no easy solution exists for the ++aa[key1][key2] case.
Is this specific to the pre-increment? aa[key1][key2]++ is
generally a useful pattern.
The general idea that library aa has a vtbl, and standart AA
fuctions like _aaGetX will access to our AA via vtbl.
Compiler will operate with aa via all those _aaGetX, _aaLen et c.
Thus aa[x][y]++; will work as early.
