On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-05-31 01:37, Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d wrote: > >> The Standard Library. I want to use D so I can do more with less hours >> writing code and less hours debugging code. Having a high quality >> standard library really helps this - unfortunately for me the first >> thing I needed from the standard library was xml parsing, which the >> documentation tells me is sub par and will be replaced in the near >> future, There is no indication of what I might like to use instead. Do >> I now use one of the other xml libraries floating around, bind a C >> based one or roll my own. > > > Use the one in Tango [1] [2]. It's really fast, at least back in the D1 > days. Supports both DOM parser, SAX parser and a pull parser >
Wouldn't this mean basically pulling all of Tango into my project and then having two copies of practically everything? That might be a practical solution but you can see why that doesn't feel like a good solution and still gives friction.
