On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 21:02:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/1/2015 12:43 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/1/15 12:00 PM, deadalnix wrote:
1/ .init for unions is not defined. I propose to define it as
the .init
of the first field + padding with 0s if the union is larger
than its
first member. It seems to be what is generated right now.
Fine.
"Fine" as in "yes" :-)
For non-native speakers, the use of "fine" is often confusing.
"Fine" in American english means "you're wrong, but I won't
argue the point." It does not signify endorsement.
Maybe this explains why my wife was upset with me when she
asked how she looked and I said "Fine".
8/ unions and structs are mangled the same way (or so it
seems). Bug or
feature ?
Not sure. Walter?
I think it's fine.
So are you saying you think don't think they are mangled the
same way, but that you don't want to bother arguing.
Craig
