On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 18:06:32 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 17:22:07 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:02:56 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Thanks to DIP 25 I think it's time to review this again. I
would implement it (if no one else wants to do it), but there
are still some unanswered questions:
1. Is 'auto ref' still the chosen syntax (I guess so)?
Why not `scope ref` (or `in ref` == `const scope ref`)?
See DIP 36
I don't see an argument against `scope ref` in DIP36, quite the
opposite...
