On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 11:35:41 +0000, weaselcat wrote: > On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 11:25:50 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: >> On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 11:06:39 UTC, weaselcat wrote: >>> it can get even better if you properly modularize your projects >>> instead of having 1-2 files that build slow, which causes a lot of >>> waiting. >> >> Yes, sure. You can probably get the same build speeds as with C if you >> organize your code in a particular way or shy away from certain >> patterns. >> >> What I was talking about was the language, meaning that you don't write >> your code to give a boost in compilation speed. Clearly possible, but >> if you use third party frameworks⦠then you're out of luck. >> >> An analogy: SQL isn't particularly expressive, but the limitations of >> the language makes it possible to execute it bottom-up. NOSQL engines >> are even less expressive, but can be even more easily distributed. > > ah yes, those famous fast C build times. > Excuse me while I go take half an hour to build GDB.
yet gcc (the C compiler part) is significantly faster than gdc on my box (both gcc and gdc are built from sources, tuned to my arch). i mean separate compilation, of course. i believe it's due to phobos.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature