On 01/06/2015 20:47, weaselcat wrote:
at the risk of sounding like a broken record, if ldc/gdc not being 2.067
stops a DDMD release due to dmd's generated code being too slow, maybe
it's time to phase dmd out ;)
It's past the time.
The traction and support that Rust gained, even before 1.0, showed that
having your primary toolchain based on GCC or LLVM is the only
sustainable way forward (and even of those two, GCC might not be able to
keep with LLVM).
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
