On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 11:01:19 +0200, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 7 June 2015 at 10:51, ketmar via Digitalmars-d < > digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 08:24:23 +0000, Temtaime wrote: >> >> > It's really bad solution. >> > >> > Are you building phobos 1000 times a day so 5 seconds is really long >> > for you ? >> > Separate compilation prevents compiler from inlining everything. >> >> how is that? even if we left lto aside, compiler needs module source >> anyway. if one will use full .d files instead of .di, nothing can >> prevent good compiler from inlining. > > > Semantic analysis is done lazily. No AST, no inline.
but everything one need to do semantic is already there. it's just calls to `semantic` are absent. with some imaginary "--aggressive-inline" option compiler can do more semantic calls and inline things properly. sure, that will slow down compilation, but that's why it should be done as opt-in feature.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
