On Monday, 8 June 2015 at 18:22:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/8/15 2:10 PM, Jeffrey Tsang wrote:
The following works:
enum foo(int x) = x + foo!(x - 1);
enum foo(int x : 0) = 0;
enum bar(T) = cast(T) 3;
enum bar(T : int) = 4;
Wrap it in a unittest{}, and complaints about multiply defined
templates
hit. Is there a reason for this?
To expand on what Timon said, a unittest block is actually a
function under the hood.
Try the same thing inside a function and you will get the same
issue.
Do this instead (outside of the unit test block):
version(unittest) {
... // same thing
}
-Steve
OK, that makes much more sense. Thanks.
