On 6/9/15 6:20 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 21:53:55 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Also, I think we should stay with libc-based I/O.
Um, won't this mean that the library then won't be usable by any
application that will want to do more than a few simultaneous queries?
Database engines usually concentrate on concurrency, not latency, so
non-asynchronous I/O is only adequate for simple programs.
He hasn't seen the contrast yet :)
In any case, I have zero plans to abandon what I've been working on
(glacially) over the last 3 years.
-Steve
