On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 09:12:09 UTC, QAston wrote:
I have seen and used lisp, still I think that Rust is
innovative. Namely the combination of very good typesystem,
best to date (because fully compiler-verified) resource
management and AST macros is innovative.
But what I like the most about is that it wasn't created in a
stike of genius by a guy in a basement, but instead by
continuous refinement of many ideas with strong desire to keep
the language small and consistent.
Yes, it is still strong arguments in favor of Rust. But D has a
garbage collector and there is no syndrome of angle brackets.
Unfortunately, I still don't know Rust templates, so nothing to
say about them.
Do templates Rust is better than D?