On Thursday, 18 June 2015 at 03:55:49 UTC, Morbid.Obesity wrote:
Progress friend, that is what you need!
You've completely misunderstood my argument. I did not mean "old > new", I meant that it doesn't matter if something is old or new, it should be judged on its own merits. Your entire reply is about "new > old" (but full of allegories and no actual arguments concerning the topic at hand).
I do not wish to get into a sentimental argument hinging on metaphors and allegories. If you do not wish to discuss factual arguments, then there is nothing to debate.
