On 22/06/2015 8:45 p.m., Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 08:08:42 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Why would IImage support alpha? Shouldn't that be on the color?
If so, the PR does support it see RGBA8 and friends.
I said "on color or IImage". Anyway transparency is a property (mask) of
an image ("material") rather than of the color itself. A color has no
transparency, there's no transparency on gamut. It doesn't make sense
for a color: transparency is used only when you add an image over
another in order to sum the *colors* of two pixels. They used to pack
alpha informations with other pixel infos (color) just for simplicity
and to have a convenient way to store info inside a file, I guess.
I just had a look at antigrain. It really is beyond this code. Well
and truly out of scope.
I mean it would be useful to grab some ideas from it.
And that it would really wonderful to have something like this.
However I think it is useful to build the library and interfaces
thinking also to possible future developments.
Andrea
Humm, I can add it as an optional part of the interface like pixel offset.
Maybe. But it does feel a little less like other libraries out there.
The main reason I'm put off of antigrain is it feels a little too much
unwieldy to me.
But of course, I can't dismiss your guys suggestions so of course I'll
dig more deeper into it! Even if I do drag my heels a little bit.
