On Monday, 22 June 2015 at 05:25:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The idea is that fun(5) would be lowered to:
auto tmp = 5;
fun(tmp);
But when talking to Andrei I didn't realize that it would be
subtly different behavior than 'auto ref' for template
functions, which makes me concerned that this is not a good
idea.
Considering we already have working 'Sealed references', why not
simply allow rvalues for plain ref?
Bonus: No risk of mixup with template auto ref after refactoring
etc.
Save auto for other potential future use.
