On 24/06/2015 12:17 a.m., Laeeth Isharc wrote:
It's great, but it's not quite a replacement for std.json, as I see it.
The stream parser is fast, and it's valuable to be able to access it at
a low level.
However, it was consciously designed to be low-level, and for something
else to go on top.
As I understand it, there is a gap between what you can currently do
with std.json (and indeed vibed json) and what you can do with
stdx.data.json. And the capability falls short of what can be done in
other standard libraries such as the ones for python.
So since we are going for a nuclear-power station included approach,
does that not mean that we need to specify what this layer should do,
and somebody should start to work on it?
Please come onto https://www.livecoding.tv/alphaglosined/ and hang out
for half an hour. I want to show you something related.
