On 06/23/2015 03:01 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/22/15 4:09 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
There is no reason to prevent templates from using the mechanism that
generates only one copy. The two mechanisms shouldn't share the same
syntax, because then there is no way to tell them apart for template
functions.
I understand. For my money I'd be okay with what's being proposed
instead of complicating the language yet again for
We're introducing a new feature either way. I don't agree that the
proposed hack complicates the language any less.
the perfect solution.
We might as well do it right. Why promote unnecessary template bloat?
