On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 22:11:03 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 01:04:01 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:We disagreed on this on irc, but I ask you to consider the following which limits the code breakage a lot more than my first proposal in chat:[...]Couldn't this even be made @nogc by just applying it to eager()? Very neat. I love it.
Err, everything but eager.
