On 06/25/2015 10:42 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 25 June 2015 at 20:41:13 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06/25/2015 04:10 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
And, IMHO, this:
fileName.readText.lowerCased.detabbed.toFile(fileName.withExtension(".foo"))
looks much better than this:
fileName.readText.lowerCaser.detabber.toFile(fileName.extensionSetter(".foo"))
Definitely. The existing functions should have been named 'joined' and
'splitted'. :o)
I actually hypothesize that "joiner"/"splitter" were chosen because
"split" the verb's past tense is also "split", which was taken by the
eager function.
It was intended as a joke, but apparently the word exists/existed
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/splitted .
