Justin Johansson wrote: > - that the .sizeof a delegate is 8 bytes (on a 32-bit machine). > > AFAIK, stack pushes are still more expensive than a pointer dereference in > contemporary > CPU architectures. > > Justin
- with this weird way of writing posts? The subject should tell us about the content, not your emotional state! :p Also I have no idea what you mean. Should delegate _values_ be heap allocated?! That'd be insanity. Also, I'm fairly sure you're wrong. The stack is relatively likely to be in the CPU cache. A random pointer dereferencing .. isn't. Also, do you really want to heap even more work on the ailing GC?
