Thank you Jonathan, I think I (like kinke in his post above)
finally understand your stance. So I guess from your POV the
following would be an ideal situation (disregarding the need to
avoid breaking changes):
1) `auto ref` for non-templates is required to make a function
accept rvalue and lvalue refs alike.
2) `auto ref` for templates is changed to mean the same thing as
1).
3) `scope ref` prevents escaping of the reference.
Neither of `auto ref` and `scope ref` would imply the other,
because you want to treat them as orthogonal. Do I understand you
right?
The main problems with this is that they aren't in fact
orthogonal: `auto ref` without `scope ref` almost only makes
sense if you want to deliberately break something. Furthermore,
`auto ref` is already taken for something else, and I'm not sure
Walter would be too happy if we wanted to change its meaning for
templates.
