On Tuesday, 30 June 2015 at 01:07:33 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 18:59:31 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 16:05:07 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 29 June 2015 at 10:35:34 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
Yes, those who want reggae can use it, and the makefile can
remain the default for now. I can't wait to ditch the
makefiles.
[...]
You could probably use the auto-tester to test reggae: simply
add the reggae source to your PR, build it with a patched
makefile, and then use reggae to build druntime/phobos. I've
used the auto-tester to test a couple PRs for various OSs
that I don't have, especially OS X.
You mean make a posix.mak that actually calls reggae instead?
Hmm... I guess that's doable. Otherwise I'd have to edit the
script the auto-tester is using.
Yes, submit a PR that adds the reggae source and modifies the
existing druntime or phobos posix.mak to build reggae, then
runs reggae to build druntime/phobos, using the linked reggae
file. Once you're sure it all works, you can delete the reggae
source and the makefile modifications and simply submit the
single reggae file that you know works, because you just tested
it on the auto-tester.
I'm not sure that'd guarantee the same output though.
If you follow the process above, I don't see why not.
Well, for instance my extra html files. If there's no explicit
check (and there probably isn't) the auto-tester will be fine
with it but the build isn't actually the same. Things... can
happen. Maybe anything that doesn't break the auto-tester doesn't
matter, it wouldn't be a crazy opinion to have.
Atila
