On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 11:09:23 +0000, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > Well, you're entitled to your opinion, and you're definitely free to > avoid C++ libraries if that what you want, but there are plenty of D > users who want good C++ interop (and for some projects, pretty much > require it - especially the corporate folks), so there's actually a > fairly high demand for it. And part of why the C++ interop that we have > is as good as it is now is because it was needed to port the compiler's > frontend to D and have it still work with the backends of the three main > compilers. > So, it's there because it serves a very practical purpose.
and still not working reliably, partly due to absence of standardized mangling schemes and ABI in C++. this is a neverending chase. > So, use it or don't, but don't expect everyone to agree with you that > interoperability with C++ is useless. but i can try! ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
