On Friday, 3 July 2015 at 14:36:24 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 07/03/2015 01:58 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 02.07.2015 um 22:45 schrieb rsw0x:
Have you considered referring to it as SDLang?
FWIW, the D project to read/write that format is named
"SDLang-D" (for exactly the reasons you describe):
https://github.com/Abscissa/SDLang-D
I'd be very much in favor of that. We had a chat with the
author about
possible improvements, but I'm unsure if that topic has been
addressed.
(Nick, do you remember by any chance where that discussion
happened?)
It was all in a ticket (a few tickets?) for SDLang-D (and maybe
DUB) on github, plus some direct email between marler8997 and
Daniel (the original SDL guy).
I think this was the main one, not sure if there were others:
https://github.com/Abscissa/SDLang-D/issues/9
Since SDLang is a fairly obscure format I think we should mirror
the docs somewhere. I was working on a project using SDLang-D and
the spec website was down which was extremely frustrating because
I couldn't find a mirror anywhere. SDLang-D's docs are pretty
good so I was able to sort of work through it during the downtime
but having the actual official docs somewhere extra would be good.
