On Wednesday, 15 July 2015 at 08:29:52 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2015 at 07:50:46 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Good to see another bad name merged in master ^_^

Was there a good name suggested that wasn't vetoed by Walter or Andrei?

For me it was absolutely clear that picking a good name is impossible even through the previous discussion (~1 year ago) because existing semantics is a mess and breaking it is out of question. Thus more realistic criteria is name consistency with some bit of fact correctness.

This was how original (Meta)List was chosen - being as bad as any other, it matched terms used by official compiler spec : http://dlang.org/template.html#TemplateParameterList http://dlang.org/template.html#TemplateArgumentList (and related docs)

It is mostly irrelevant though (as long as it is not fundamentally misleading) - the whole issue is not about picking a single name but major cleanup sweeps through dlang.org and Phobos ensuring it is all on same terms and any possible abmiguity is clearly explained.

Reply via email to