On Thursday, 16 July 2015 at 13:48:06 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Thursday, 16 July 2015 at 10:19:11 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I am all for that but it needs to be explicitly acknowledged
and implemented together with a rename.
There is no renaming involved here, as the issue concerns the
alias parameter language constructs. Or are you suggesting
using another keyword than "alias"?
– David
I mean that if name AliasSomething goes to 2.068, matching change
to compiler argument lists must land in same release - and there
must be a change log entry connecting and explaining those two.
