On 7/20/2015 8:47 PM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
3. Force stability language through codebase. Maybe ddmd will be a bad example as it's pretty much written in the style of a Poor-mans-C++-in-D. But not breaking language compatibility between 2.068 and LATEST should help reduce regressions between versions. Most people I've talked to agree.
I agree it makes sense to stick with 2.068 to compile ddmd until gdc and ldc can switch to ddmd.
