On 21 July 2015 at 11:04, Johannes Pfau via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:54:44 -0700 > schrieb Walter Bright <[email protected]>: > >> On 7/20/2015 11:34 PM, Martin Nowak wrote: >> > I got this number from Daniel, he didn't found a reason. >> > Chances are it's uniformly slower because of dmd's backend, but of >> > course profiling might help. >> >> Consider that the Win32 version of dmd is built with with the same >> backend as dmd. If there's a slowdown with that version, it isn't due >> to the backend. > > "On Win32 the performance difference is much smaller, because it's > going from compiling with dmc to compiling with dmd" >
You beat me to it....
