On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 04:06:11PM +0000, Zoadian via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Tuesday, 21 July 2015 at 06:49:10 UTC, deadalnix wrote: > >Some of the proposals do not even make any sense. Come on, all people > >that got into this know how newcomer react to the Tuple name noticed > >the same reaction. Yet, there is a large crow of idiots (sorry if you > >are in that crowd, on that one you ARE an idiot) that will send that > >proposal in again and again. Anyone that proposed that name at this > >point should only be laughed at, as it is clearly the manifestation > >of someone that have not deal first hand with the problems of the > >historical name and is serving as a living example of Dunning Kruger. > > i get that TypeTuple is confusing as it is not _limited_ to types, but > why is it not a tuple?
Because, among other things, it auto-expands. T -- PNP = Plug 'N' Pray
