On 07/25/2015 02:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/23/15 4:52 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 7/23/2015 1:08 PM, Dicebot wrote:
> I am not sure how it applies.
D interfaces (defined with the 'interface' keyword) are simple dispatch
types, they don't require an Object. Such interfaces can also have
default implementations.
Is this new? I agree we should allow it, but I don't think it was added
to the language yet.
Andrei
In any case, the painful thing about the RangeObject interfaces is that
they transform value types into reference types.