On 7/28/15 9:30 AM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= <[email protected]>"
wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 12:46:25 UTC, Adrian Matoga wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 02:05:56 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"tcak" wrote in message news:[email protected]...
Why not like pragma(inline, [try | force | no]) ?
Walter liked the boolean version, which is certainly better than
nothing.
I regret I missed this pull request and the chance to vote for
"always"/"never" proposed by yebblies, which hit the right neurons in
reader's brain instantly, unlike the generic true/false.
Someone made this exact suggestion in the PR, but as happens with most
sensible suggestions, it was shot down.
the only thing I can thing of is that true/false are (or have the
potential to be in this context) expressions, which means one could use
compile-time logic to specify inlining. The same wouldn't be true of
arbitrary identifiers.
-Steve
