Re: std.data.json formal review

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/30/2015 9:58 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
If we can't have the minimal necessary module paths then I'm completely in favor
of parseJSONStream over the more general parseStream. I want that "json" in
there one way or another (preferably by the method which makes it optional while
maintaining brevity).

I would think it unlikely to be parsing two different formats in one file. But 
in any case, you can always do this:

   import std.data.json : parseJSON = parse;

Or put the import in a scope:

   void doNaughtyThingsWithJson()
   {
       import std.data.json;
       ...
       x.parse();
   }

The latter seems to be becoming the preferred D style.