On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 20:30:35 UTC, learn wrote:
are you trying to tell me that this compiler isn't good enough
for anyone who doesn't want to change his ecosystem that works
for everything else i develop?
i came here because i read the petitions to have D in VS - and
it said it works with VS2015.
the mixing of vs's will cause a registry problem and produce
tons of work if i want to delete it. some thing might easier on
linux, but i use windows.
so, by all means, advertise the correct thing and if you want
to dink around, than tell people it is only for hobbyist, works
only on linux and can not be used for commercial programs on
windows.
i can live with that, because i will not try it. BUT it will
still make think
would be nice to use on windows.
btw - i still want to use D in VS 2015 only.
My comment was about the limited resources of this community. If
there are false statements about VS 2015 support, then they
should be corrected. And if you feel that VS 2015 support is a
must, then it is entirely reasonable to not use D.
I was responding to what I felt was a harsh response by Tofu
Ninja. IMO it is not realistic to think that any developer can
sit down and use his preferred setup without any rough edges. It
comes with writing D code. Others have told you that the problem
is being fixed, told you how you can still use VS, and I don't
see what more they should have done.
