On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 12:58:45 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 12:37:37 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
I think stability of the DMD backend is a goal of much higher
value than the performance of the code it emits. DMD is never
going to match the code generation quality of LLVM and GCC,
which have had many, many man-years invested in them. Working
on DMD optimizations is essentially duplicating this work, and
IMHO I think it's not only a waste of time, but harmful to D
because of the risk of regressions.
+1
+1
