On 08/20/2015 09:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 8/20/15 2:43 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/20/2015 07:50 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Very true. Not much we can do about it. For now, the best thing to do is
always compare arrays to null instead of simply if(arr):
if(arr != null)
Alternatively, but a little more ugly, is to check the length:
if(arr.length)
Isn't the best way to compare to []?
if(arr!=[])
I think comparing to null is needlessly confusing.
Same thing. [] is null.
-Steve
Sure. I still consider arr!=[] cleaner style. YMMV.
