On 24-Aug-2015 09:17, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-08-21 23:55, Walter Bright wrote:I don't understand why the C++ committee, in its quest to improve the language, has not pushed forward with proper replacements for typical preprocessor uses, with the intent of eventually deprecating it entirely.With modules being already implemented in Clang, is there a legitimate use case for the preprocessor left?
Code generation and crude meta-programming. -- Dmitry Olshansky
