On 8/25/15 11:02 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/25/2015 08:18 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 08/18/2015 12:21 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* All new stuff should go in std.experimental. I assume "stdx" would
change to that, should this work be merged.
Though stdx (or better std.x) would have been a prettier and more
exciting name for std.experimental to begin with.
The great thing about the experimental package is that we are actually
allowed to rename it. :-)
I strongly oppose renaming it. I don't want Phobos to fall into the trap
of javax, which was supposed to be "experimental" but then became unmovable.
std.experimental is much more obvious that you shouldn't expect things
to live there forever.
-Steve
