On Friday, 28 August 2015 at 01:42:22 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"John Colvin" wrote in message news:[email protected]...I think he's saying that the argument: "Don't work on DMD because it's already far behind" could have been applied to working on LLVM when it was far behind GCC. I don't agree, but I think that's what he means.It helps that LLVM has a superior license.
+ LLVM started as an academic research project in compiler design, so it was never far behind conceptually...
