On Friday, 28 August 2015 at 14:55:51 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:17:55AM +1000, Daniel Murphy via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
[...]
[...]
Apparently. :-P
[...]
6 months isn't that long of a time. Excited to hear that 100% D
DMD will soon arrive.
Another thing I just realized, is that by moving DMD to D,
we've given ourselves much greater motivation to improve DMD's
codegen, which I think is a good (and necessary!) thing, being
the reference compiler and all. Not every newbie will
understand the current situation where the reference compiler
doesn't produce the most performant code.
T
And the other advantage is that we'll get performant code with a
performant compiler - GDC/LDC are much slower running than DMD.
