On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 11:45:36 UTC, skoppe wrote:
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 09:54:31 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Saturday, 29 August 2015 at 16:12:52 UTC, skoppe wrote:
I don't think it is a good idea to call create_handle() in
the constructor. Why not just pass a handle into the Resource?
This isn't related to the topic.
By putting create_handle in the constructor, you inevitably end
up putting free_handle in some (destructor) function. The
problems you are having might be different/easier when you make
something else do the (de)construction. Like, say, a
ResourceManager.
The handle is not important, the idiom applies equally to any
class with a non-trivial destructor.
