Actually, in the point cloud on the web demo I've linked before, which is EXTREMELY compute intensive code, we experience a barely measurable loss in performance between pnacl and native code. 20% loss would be huge, but we see nothing like that, probably within 5% is closer to our experience. On 5 Sep 2015 3:11 am, "deadalnix via Digitalmars-d" < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 4 September 2015 at 14:56:48 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote: > >> On Friday, 4 September 2015 at 14:45:39 UTC, rsw0x wrote: >> >>> Because it has the path of least resistance. It's still a poor >>> technology that is just treating the symptoms. >>> >> >> pnacl/pepper is not good either, they are both poor technologies. >> >> > Statement do not makes arguements. pNaCl is portable, take only a 20% hit > compared to pure native and is compact to send through the wire. > >
