Re: Containers

[bitwise via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 5 September 2015 at 06:44:30 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky 
wrote:
On 05-Sep-2015 05:36, bitwise wrote:
On Friday, 4 September 2015 at 23:15:54 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
I feel should add that I still very much favor simple value 
type
containers.
C++ does just fine with value-type containers. I know "D isn't 
C++" but
if it works, it works.
[...]

I agree if only on the grounds of composability. Value-typed 
containers are "more" then ref-based ones. As we can always get:

Unqiue!ValueTypedContainer or RC!ValueTypedContainer

on top of value type container.


or even a class! =)

static import collections;
final class List(T) {
    private collections.List!T _list;
    alias _list this;

    this(Args...)(Args args) {
        _list = collections.List!T(args);
    }
}