On Sunday, 6 September 2015 at 20:17:32 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Sunday, 6 September 2015 at 20:05:20 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Sunday, 6 September 2015 at 18:52:34 UTC, bitwise wrote:
[...]
You should have got that's even not what i was talking about.
Basic summary of the conversation:
- you: hello what do you thing about my helpers functions?
- others: nothing, we won't add this because streams are
deprecated. Maybe they'll come back one day if someone comes
with a kind of "rangified" stream solution.
- you: how can I "rangify" a stream ?
- me: hello, you can add the ranges primitives.
- you: yes but it doesn't work for my particular case.
- me: (sigh) I know, I was talking about how streams can be
rangified in a general way.
I think that the misunderstanding happens after 'others'
intervention: 'other' did not suggested that your helper
functions can be made in the "Range" fashion.
The problem is, that you are concerned with who said what
instead of addressing the problem.
The point is, streams can contain mixed data types. Any adopted
solution should address this, and you haven't presented one.
I believe something like this could work:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/5f0ee693631a
I don't care about your problem, adding some type-specific
readers & writers is quite straight forward and the solution you
proposed initially is Ok.
But...at a particular point you asked how Streams can be
rangified. That was the only reason why i posted here. Roger this
?
