On Tuesday, 8 September 2015 at 09:01:22 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 September 2015 at 08:42:59 UTC, Edwin van Leeuwen
wrote:
This does sound like a really good idea. Is the plan to turn
every unittest block into a benchmark (automatically), or did
you add specific benchmarks blocks?
you would add specific benchmark blocks, because the benchmarks
might run to long for a rapid development cycle.
Just to be clear. The PR is to add the needed ground work for
adding benchmark, or does it also add some benchmarks itself?
It does seem a bit of a shame not to use the unittests at all for
baseline benchmarks. The unittests already exist, with reasonable
good coverage. Getting good benchmark coverage by writing
specific/new benchmarks would mean a huge amount of extra effort.
