Bill Baxter, el 19 de octubre a las 14:18 me escribiste: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:58 PM, KennyTM~ <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 20, 09 03:40, Piotrek wrote: > >> > >> Bill Baxter pisze: > >>>>> > >>>>> Just get rid of the the one-argument foreach over AAs altogether and > >>>>> force > >>>>> the user to be > >>>>> explicit about it. > >>>> > >>>> I wouldn't do so. Would anybody do an error by thinking that foreach > >>>> (elem,table) should iterate over keys? > >>> > >>> Bearophile. And anyone coming from python, at the least. And anyone > >>> who agrees with the logic of connecting 'in' with what gets iterated. > >>> > >> > >> And only python that I am aware of. Java,C#,PHP (which hold most of all > >> programmers) are defaulting to values unless explicitly stated. > >> > > > > and Javascript. and Objective-C. > > I took a look at C# yesterday, and I don't think it is true there. > As far as I can tell IDictionary is the closest thing to AA in C#, and > for it default iteration yields Key,Value pairs called > DictionaryEntry. MSDN Says: "Since each element of the IDictionary > object is a key/value pair, the element type is not the type of the > key or the type of the value. Instead, the element type is > DictionaryEntry."
I guess everybody knows, but this is what C++ does =P -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Did you know the originally a Danish guy invented the burglar-alarm unfortunately, it got stolen
