On Thursday, 1 October 2015 at 02:53:25 UTC, lobo wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2015 at 01:54:22 UTC, bitwise wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2015 at 01:32:17 UTC, bitwise wrote:
I don't think it would be that hard to make something this
possible:
for(int x : iota<int>(0, 5).to<take>(3))
printf("%d ", x);
Curiosity got the best of me:
http://ideone.com/RoJxLa
output doesn't show up for some reason, but it works.
Bit
Yes, that's what we have always done with iterators. The point
is users shouldn't have to write or instantiate iterators
explicitly for any custom range.
bye,
lobo
I understand, but the C++ committee seems very conservative to
me, so when it's this easy to add for(:) support by giving ranges
begin()/end() functions, it makes me doubt they will actually
change the language for it.
Bit
