On Friday, 2 October 2015 at 11:22:00 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/02/2015 05:32 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
I like the idea, I just have a practical question on
std.experimental.testing: should it go ahead as-is? Should the
custom
assertions be removed and the rest kept? Should they go in
as-is and
then deleted when/if this DIP is implemented?
As long as it's in experimental, proceed as you find fit. We
can decide later whether changes are in order. -- Andrei
That's what I was hoping for. Good, unless anybody has comments
to make on the current state of the PR, I'll leave everything as
it is now.
Atila
