On 10/12/15 2:39 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 10/11/2015 10:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:...1. You say that DIP25 is a failure. More so, you demand that is admitted without evidence.FWIW, DIP25 is insufficiently formal and/or incorrect.
That I agree with. We need to get a lot better at making precise DIPs.
I have been able to find those holes in the implementation pretty quickly (I'll also put them to bugzilla):
Thanks. That's great work! Andrei
